Samuel Press
.jpg)
As the administration of President Donald J. Trump nears the 100-day mark of his second, nonconsecutive term, observers across the political spectrum are closely examining the trajectory of the White House’s domestic and foreign policy initiatives. The first 100 days—long regarded as a symbolic and practical benchmark of presidential governance—offer insight into the administration’s ideological orientation, institutional strategy, and policy priorities. This paper evaluates ten key issue areas that have emerged as central to the Trump administration’s early agenda, assessing the degree of progress, institutional friction, and political viability associated with each.
Status: Advancing Rapidly
The administration has made immigration enforcement its most assertively pursued priority. Key actions include mass deportations, legal challenges to Supreme Court decisions, and the detainment of activists. These policies signal an expansive view of executive authority and have drawn international condemnation. The scope and speed of implementation make this a hallmark of Trump’s early presidency.
Status: Advancing
More than 30,000 federal employees have been dismissed under a sweeping restructuring plan. The administration is also reclassifying civil service positions to reduce job security, weakening public-sector unions, and dismantling agencies such as USAID and the Department of Education. This agenda is ideologically driven and proceeding with focused administrative execution.
Status: Mixed Progress
High tariffs on Chinese imports and protectionist trade policies have caused sector-specific disruptions, especially in urban centers dependent on imports. Promises of job creation have not yet materialized at scale. Additionally, proposed reforms to lower U.S.drug prices remain in the deliberation phase, with no definitive policy action to date.
Status: Advancing, but Fragmented
Foreign policy under Trump remains defined by a retreat from multilateralism. The administration has withdrawn from key international agreements (e.g., the Paris Accord and WHO), reassessed NATO commitments, and significantly reduced foreign aid. Efforts to strengthen bilateral relations—particularly with India—are ongoing, though a cohesive global strategy is lacking.
Status: Advancing Quietly
Environmental deregulation has proceeded largely via executive orders, enabling the expansion of fossil fuel development and the rollback of Obama-era environmental protections. While policy changes are substantial, they face mounting legal challenges at the state level and remain vulnerable to future reversals.
Status: Advancing
The administration has frozen over $65 million in Title X family planning funds, directly impacting access to reproductive healthcare for nearly 850,000 individuals. These actions align with broader efforts to restrict reproductive rights and reshape federal healthcare spending. Further legislative action may follow.
Status: Advancing with Resistance
The White House is pursuing a legal strategy aimed at expanding executive authority, often in defiance of judicial rulings. While the administration has succeeded in initiating several confrontations, the courts continue to serve as an effective institutional check, particularly in immigration and regulatory matters.
Status: Lagging
Although the administration has signaled intent to pursue antitrust enforcement against large technology firms, tangible regulatory or legal outcomes remain limited. Ongoing investigations and high-profile cases have not yet produced decisive action. Regulatory oversight in this sector remains underdeveloped.
Status: Early Stage, Symbolic Action
A legal challenge against Harvard University over federal funding has gained media attention but does not yet constitute a comprehensive education reform strategy. Current activity is more emblematic than structural, suggesting that education policy is not an immediate administrative priority.
Status: Stalled Influence
Despite public criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and efforts to pressure the central bank to lower interest rates, the Fed remains institutionally independent. Thus far, the administration’s rhetoric has not translated into substantive changes to monetary policy.
The Trump administration’s first 100 days have revealed a clear prioritization of executive action and ideological realignment over consensus-driven policymaking. Immigration, federal work force restructuring, and environmental deregulation are advancing at a rapid pace, while other areas—such as technology regulation, education, and monetary policy—are lagging or stalling due to legal and institutional barriers.
In this early phase, the administration has demonstrated its capacity to implement disruptive and often controversial policies. However, the durability of these initiatives will depend on their ability to withstand legal scrutiny, institutional resistance, and electoral accountability. As the administration moves beyond its openings, the balance between ambition and implementation will become the defining test of its governance.
